WaterGuru Sense 2 vs. Taylor Tests

[zhenya]

I received and installed my WaterGuru Sense 2 today. After the first test, some of the results differ greatly from my Taylor tests

WaterGuru
FC - 5.1
TA - 99
CYA - 86

Taylor
FC - 1.5
TA - 80
CYA - 60

Should I not trust WaterGuru? Should I not trust my own tests?

Thanks.

 

[KJB1]

Taylor has a much better record. I got a couple PH meters and they were useless. I could test the same water 3 times and get 3 different results

 

[reggiehammond]

Yes, based on those results, you should return the Water Guru for a full refund.

 

[SoCalTFP]

How are you measuring FC with the Taylor? I also see no PH/CH comparison, curious did those line up close or do you not have those in whatever Taylor kit your using.

Assuming FAS-DPD trust Taylor. And otherwise test Taylor haha. WaterGuru seems like it would fit a making sure the FC/PH is good between testing hole. If it’s consistently that far off FC testing I’d follow reggiehammond’s suggestion and send it back.

 

[zhenya]

pH and CH showed practically the same so I didn't include them.

Yes, I use FAS-DPD

 

[HermanTX]

I looked back at some old threads on WG and the results are similar - FC tend to be way off. That is a critical test and must be more accurate to be trusted. Seems that WG has not improved significantly since 2019.

 

[zhenya]

Here's my latest update on my WaterGuru experiment. In short, my Taylor test was significantly inaccurate.

I reached out to the WaterGuru customer service team with my discoveries, and I must say, their response was nothing short of exceptional. I had the opportunity to chat with one of their lead engineers, who also happens to be a significant contributor to this forum. They provided me with another Taylor FAS-DPD test, which confirmed the inaccuracy of my previous test. I now purchased a new Taylor K-2006, and the results it produces align closely with those from WaterGuru. I've decided to keep WaterGuru, as it will be very helpful for daily pool monitoring, with Taylor tests done as necessary.

In all honesty, I was thoroughly impressed by the level of support and communication provided by WaterGuru.

 

[Jsf721]

Here's my latest update on my WaterGuru experiment. In short, my Taylor test was significantly inaccurate.

I reached out to the WaterGuru customer service team with my discoveries, and I must say, their response was nothing short of exceptional. I had the opportunity to chat with one of their lead engineers, who also happens to be a significant contributor to this forum. They provided me with another Taylor FAS-DPD test, which confirmed the inaccuracy of my previous test. I now purchased a new Taylor K-2006, and the results it produces align closely with those from WaterGuru. I've decided to keep WaterGuru, as it will be very helpful for daily pool monitoring, with Taylor tests done as necessary.

In all honesty, I was thoroughly impressed by the level of support and communication provided by WaterGuru.

Why was your test kit off that you needed a new one ?

 

[kimkats]

My GUESS is their regents were older. It is suggested to replace the regents at least every other year. It also depends on how/where the regents are stored. They should be stored in a cool, dark area. Mine are in a cabinet in my kitchen.

 

[Jsf721]

My GUESS is their regents were older. It is suggested to replace the regents at least every other year. It also depends on how/where the regents are stored. They should be stored in a cool, dark area. Mine are in a cabinet in my kitchen.

We should sell a test kit for the reagents .

 

[wdsheffer]

We should sell a test kit for the reagents .

Maybe I missed some sarcasm, but...

Standard Sampler

tftestkits.net

 

[Jsf721]

Maybe I missed some sarcasm, but...

Standard Sampler

tftestkits.net

No sarcasm I was just saying I’d like to know if my reagents are good or bad. I purchased the largest TFPro test kit and it’s served me well through a few slams. Would hate to throw away good reagents or use bad ones.

 

[RespiteFL]

Why was your test kit off that you needed a new one ?

Same question. What was wrong with the original Taylor tests?

 

[Padle]

I have been using WG sense (version 1) for over 6 months, and the FC and PH have always been very accurate compared to my Taylor tests.

 

[bigh]

Seeing big difference in Waterguru vs local pool suppler testing.

WG
PH 7.7
FC 3.1

Local pool supplier testing
PH 7.8
FC 5.1

 

[reggiehammond]

And a good chances that neither are right.

Test Kits Compared

 

[Jsf721]

Seeing big difference in Waterguru vs local pool suppler testing.

WG
PH 7.7
FC 3.1

Local pool supplier testing
PH 7.8
FC 5.1

Get the TF-Pro. Once I got this it pays for itself in accuracy and in time saved driving to the pool store (gas too). Plus your not buying unnecessary nonsense from them based on flawed tests.

 

[Jsf721]

Get the TF-Pro. Once I got this it pays for itself in accuracy and in time saved driving to the pool store (gas too). Plus your not buying unnecessary nonsense from them based on flawed tests.

Came back to write get the smart stir option just makes life so much easier when you don’t have to swirl the vile.

 

[masscc]

Hello ZHENYA, It's been about a year since your posts, and I'm wondering if you can provide an update on your Waterguru experience. Are you still happy with it? I just ran across it today on the internet and came here to search the forums to see if anyone had any reviews. Thanks!

 

[reggiehammond]

Hello ZHENYA, It's been about a year since your posts, and I'm wondering if you can provide an update on your Waterguru experience. Are you still happy with it? I just ran across it today on the internet and came here to search the forums to see if anyone had any reviews. Thanks!

A lot of people have tried it, most discontinue use as its accuracy isn't worth the effort and expense.