Welcome to TFP!

There's a lot to unpack here, so let's get started:
1 - Stay out of the pool store. Their advice and products are having negative impact on your pool. Test your own water.
2 - Obtain a TF-100 (link in my signature) or Taylor K-2006C. These test kits are easy and reliable to use.
3 - Cloudiness is due to algae not copper. To kill and remove algae you need to do the
SLAM Process.
Be sure to read and bookmark our
Pool Care Basics for more info. It's that easy.
Thanks duraleigh, Texas Splash, ajw22, and kimkats, for your warm welcome, your questions, your comments, and of course for your assistance!! In reply to various questions some of you raised, information is now provided in my updated signature.
I tested the pool water today with a LaMotte copper test kit (Code 3619...see Ebay item 163450058577). In case you are not already familiar with it, the LaMotte Cu test kit is an indicator-type test method using 5 drops of two reagents into 10 ml pool water, with ppm Cu determined by comparing the resulting blue shade (obtained 3 minutes after mixing) against a provided set of 8 color standards on white paper. The color standards correspond with 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9 ppm free Cu. Today the pool water tested somewhere between 0.15-0.25ppm free copper, in contrast to the 0.7 ppm copper result provided by the Leslie's test conducted yesterday. [Yes, yes, all of you told me so!] I duplicated the LaMotte copper test with a sample taken from the other end of the pool, and produced an identical 0.15-0.25 ppm free copper result. Then I tested the pool water copper level again, this time using AquaCheck copper test strips. The result was a color corresponding with about 0.2 ppm Cu. With all of that evidence, there is more than ample reason to trust the 0.15-0.25 ppm and 0.2 ppm results over Leslie's 0.7 ppm result. Moreover, the 0.15-0.25 ppm result corresponds with the dilution level. Still further, I had tested my pool water before beginning the first of the four 33% drain-refill cycles. At that time, the water tested at the 0.9 ppm copper upper limit of the LaMotte test (dont recall the AquaCheck test strip result, but it was conducted it too, and I believe it corresponded with at least 1 ppm). Finally, to make sure copper was not present in the water used to refill the pool after each of the draining cycles, today I also conducted copper testing on the city water used to fill the pool, and got 0 ppm on both the LaMotte test and the AquaCheck strip test.
So all the evidence stacks up consistently that the Leslie's result of 0.7 ppm was NOT accurate. Lesson learned. It was surprisingly hard for me to finally accept that Leslie's test result was not accurate (even though you told me so), but your advice plus my own testing sealed the deal for me. No more tests at Leslie's. With their expensive automated test equipment, it is difficult for the average pool owner to accept that the Leslie's test results are less accurate than their own tests, and can be miles off the true values. It is a certainty that every swim season millions of $$$ are wasted, and millions of hours of pool use are lost, due to inaccurate test results at pool stores.
Fortunately, all of your comments seem to be in general agreement that I should SLAM the pool now and not drain to reduce the the copper further, even if copper was actually still at 0.7 ppm. However, as it now appears that copper is somewhere in the range of about 0.2 ppm, that level of copper is certainly not harmful and will serve as supplemental algaecide, and is not likely to stain anything. If I have interpreted your comments incorrectly, please let me know. Otherwise, I will balance the alkalinity and then lower the pH to 7.2 and SLAM the pool with liquid chlorine until a reading of 12 ppm free chlorine is reached. It may require 20-25 gallons of liquid chlorine, but of course there is hope that it will require less than that. We shall see. I will report back after the SLAM has been conducted.
I will conduct the slam at a pH of 7.2 and alkalinity in the 110-120 range, but my calcium hardness will be virtually nonexistent because the needed 150 pounds of calcium chloride will not arrive for another week. Please let me know if that will adversely affect the SLAM. Also, I have ordered some Pooltec algaecide after viewing the TFP video library:
. Unfortunately it too will not arrive until after the SLAM has been completed, but reading between the lines it seems from all your comments that with all the new facts you would still be in general agreement that I should SLAM now to prevent a really bad algae bloom from building, in spite of the fact that I will have no calcium hardness present, and no algaecide to supplement the chlorine.
Thanks so much for all of your technical assistance and for your encouragement!! It will be very exciting to see if these plans result in crystal clear pool water!
Best Regards,
Bo